Thoughts and Caveats on Patricks Audio Book Performances

I have been truly honored to be asked to perform audio books for several excellent authors. Other books I perform as personal life goals or activism.

You may find the complete list here: Our Audio Books

Performing an audio book is a unique experience from any other media creation… You are literally lending your voice and inflection and a part of your personality to give life to the words of someone else entirely. Normally when I compose content the words are my own. Their meanings and intent come from me. I never say things I do not mean. I never promote ideas that I do not completely agree with. I have well thought out policies for what I will discuss and offer opinions on that I rarely deviate from.

For example, I generally do not give my opinions on or do interviews with people giving what I consider to be medical advice much more serious than general diet or exercise. I do not want to be responsible for amplifying a message that may lead someone to do something that ends up causing them harm. If its in the context of a debate with an opposing expert present that’s different… But the idea I’m trying to get across here is that I think quite a bit more than you might expect about the things that I communicate on my platforms and how I communicate them.

Audio books dont work like that though. I dont get the option to only give voice to the parts of a book that I agree with… And there is an amplified level of discomfort for me when I am not just interviewing someone saying something I disagree with… But I am actually the one saying the words! Ugh! It can be rough. So first and foremost I do not and would not accept a request to do a book that is too far out of alignment. Second I try to remember that they arent my words and if I disagree with them I need to create my own content making that case rather than turn down work that might do a lot of good save for a small portion that I disagree with.

So here on this post I will cover some specifics of the audio books I have done that I disagree with and will try to keep it updated as I produce more going forward.

The Most Dangerous Superstition

It has been some time since I performed this audio book. To my memory I took issue with very little. Perhaps nothing.

Defending the Undefendable II

There were several points in this book that I even have out takes for where I am reading along and then stop in a moment of incredulous hilarity and say to myself out loud, “What the fuck are you saying Patrick?!” lol There are some absurd topics covered in the book and they are for the most part covered very well. However there is some language used in discussion around homosexuals, black people, and a few other groups of people that I would have definitely worded differently. Though, you know, this book came out at a different time… Who knows, had I been around back then to perform this I might not have objected at the time. But generally — this book is spot on.

No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority

I very much disagree with Lysanders take on voting. I have created much content going on at length about the specifics of why he is wrong with his vote bullets analogy. You can find more info on that here: The Morality of Voting

This is actually a very strong example of the conflict I described in the intro to this page. I literally give voice to things that I think does and has mislead people into taking actions that I can show to be immoral by the standard of the Non-Aggression Principle. Did I refuse to create the performance? No. There is too much good in this book. I simply had to have this be a thing that I did during my time alive in this universe.

The Controlled Demolition of the American Empire

This book has a lot of great information on a variety of important topics. I dont want to make the quantity of text that follows minimize this fact. I learned a damn lot that I didnt know reading this thing. There are a few hot topics that I must make sure my opinions are published on if my voice is to be out there speaking the opposite.

I very much disagree with some of the conclusions reached or the blanket statements made about certain specific subjects. Here are a few notes on each topic:

Vaccines: I’m going to spend extra time and words on this objection because of the reasons I detailed in the beginning of this page — it deals with medical advice that may or at least could result in someone being harmed. I specifically refrain from giving advice on this topic on any of my platforms as a pretty firm rule.

The book generally takes what I consider to be an unbalanced position on vaccines. In some specific cases in the book I would even say it takes an outright irrational position on them. I have created more than a few pieces of content containing my full position on this so I wont do it again here. The summary is this. Vaccines are generally efficacious. Vaccines also do have some very real risks with very real dangers to some people. Each vaccine is different and comes with different efficacies and risk profiles and each should be discussed on a case by case basis. Anyone making blanket statements about all of them is almost certainly wrong. Generally you should not take medical advice from those without adequate training. Also, remember the Wizards First Rule:

People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it’s true, or because they’re afraid it might be true. Peoples’ heads are full of knowledge, facts and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true. People are stupid; they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so are all the easier to fool.

Many antivaxxers are wrong. Many provaxxers are wrong. People that got them and turned out fine dont understand those that got hit with the rare allergies or side effects and usually take an overly simplistic position on vaccinations. People that lost children to those side effects usually do not have an unbiased or rational position on vaccinations; and why the hell would you expect them to?

Dont be stupid. The truth is usually more nuanced and much harder to uncover. Think for yourself. Talk to people that have experience and training. Decide for yourself and never for others. This is liberty.

Taxes: There are a couple isolated moments when taxes are discussed as if they’re legitimate responsibilities to the “local communities” of the companies being expected to “pay” them… This is of course totally false. All taxation is immoral extortion. No person or group of people operating together as a company bears any involuntary obligations to pay money to any government. And in the following paragraph to the moment above it even says as much! Though it appears to be a strange reversal. So I’m adding it here just to be clear on my position. I consider this mostly a non-issue as in most every other moment in the book taxes are rightly labeled as the theft and extortion that they are.

Corporations: There are also moments in the book when companies growing and operating outside their home country with no allegiance to “any flag” nor any swearing an oath of loyalty to “the people” is discussed as if that in and of itself is a bad thing. Or that when a company takes steps to avoid tax-extortion that it is somehow “cheating taxpayers”. While many of these international companies do a lot of evil shit… Not being loyal to some particular geographical gang is not one of them and neither is finding inventive ways to get less of your assets stolen.

In Closing

So people will just hopefully understand, and this writing will hopefully go to evince, something that I bet most people already think and know and yet here I am still too paranoid to not write pages making it explicit….. That Patrick Smith does not endorse everything in the audio books he performs.

Read MoreDisenthrall / Anarchast

 53 total views,  1 views today

Leave a Reply